- Exponential Edge
- Posts
- Your guide to insurance as a yield strategy in DeFi
Your guide to insurance as a yield strategy in DeFi
DeFi insurance involves providing or obtaining protection against financial losses caused by adverse events, such as hacks, scams, or stablecoin depegs, within the DeFi ecosystem.
Hey Edge readers,
This week, we're exploring decentralized insurance platforms, how they offer DeFi users protection from exploits, and how you can become an insurance provider to earn yield.
Here's what we're covering this week:
DeFi insurance unpacked 🛡️
Learn how insurance works in a decentralized ecosystem.Spotlight on Sherlock 🕵️♂️
Explore the mechanics behind the USDC insurance pool.Ethena launches stablecoin with 27% APY
Layer 1s surging, lending risks and more.
Stay sharp. 🫡
-The Exponential team
Is Sherlock the solution to decentralized insurance?
Sherlock stands out in the DeFi landscape as an audit marketplace and smart contract insurance protocol on the Ethereum blockchain. It offers a dual safeguard to DeFi users by coupling security audits from top-tier auditors with actual insurance coverage for the smart contracts under scrutiny. This two-pronged approach is in contrast with traditional audit firms that primarily depend on their reputation to win business, an approach that may not optimally align incentives.
Sherlock is unique in that it offers protocols actual financial guarantees in the form of USDC. If a Sherlock-audited and insured contract were to get exploited, the protocol's USDC-denominated insurance pool will be used to pay out or reimburse for part of that loss.
Understanding the insurance pool
In Sherlock's platform, stakers play the role of traditional insurers. By depositing USDC into the insurance pool for predetermined periods—either half a year or a full year—you become an insurance provider for those protocols. In return for undertaking that risk, you earn a yield, generated from insurance premiums paid by customer protocols and bonus incentives distributed in Sherlock's governance token, SHER.
Choosing between the 6-month and 12-month staking options depends on one's outlook on the future trajectory of incentives. If you anticipate a decrease in incentives, locking in for a year to secure a higher rate of SHER tokens could be advantageous. However, this also exposes you to potentially more insurance payouts. Once the lock-up term is up, stakers can opt to either withdraw their stake or reinvest it back into the pool.
There are three stages of the payout process:
The initial exploit event
When the claim gets submitted
When the claim gets paid out
Liability for payouts remains solely with those whose stake remains locked during the payout phase. If you withdraw before claims are paid out, then you are exempt. Further, Sherlock ensures that each protocol's policy is capped at a maximum of 50%, mitigating the risk of any single protocol's exploit disproportionately impacting the insurance pool.
Is it worth the risk?
In reality, it remains to be seen if this is a sustainable solution for decentralized insurance offerings. Users who have staked in Sherlock have generally been burned as customer protocols are not paying nearly enough premiums to compensate depositors for the associated risks.
As a result, Sherlock has seen its USDC reserves fallen substantially as it has had to payout claims for several exploits (e.g. Euler). This puts more pressure on Sherlock to attract more depositors and even led to poor decisions like putting user-deposited funds into lending protocols to generate additional yield. To continue forward, Sherlock will have to increase its premiums to a point where it makes more economic sense for users.
If you’re interested in learning more, check out our protocol report below. 👇
What type of pools would you like to invest in through Exponential? |
In the news
Pantera analysts see a half-trillion dollar opportunity in bringing DeFi to Bitcoin - Read
Hack VC raises $150 million to invest in early-stage crypto and AI startups - Read
Wormhole lands partnership with AMD to realize its zero-knowledge roadmap - Read
Avalanche activity is heating up driven by memecoins, GameFi, and real-world assets - Read
Solana’s DeFi TVL tops $2 billion for first time since June 2022 - Read
Ethena’s new stablecoin offering 27% APY by shorting ETH already attracts over $300 million in TVL - Read
Trending topics
A lot of new eyes on Ethena today and people are right to point out the risks involved
I wanted to take a sec to highlight some of the extensive work we've done surrounding the risks of the design, and specifically addressing funding risk
Before I get into the meat and veg… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
— Conor Ryder (@ConorRyder)
10:27 PM • Feb 19, 2024
Monolithic platforms like Aave are a one-size-fits all risk model = every user is exposed to the same risk. To grow, these platforms need to list more collateral, increase efficiency or add new UX features. This indeed increases the risk for every user.
Morpho has a… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
— Paul Frambot | Morpho (@PaulFrambot)
12:53 PM • Feb 21, 2024
L3s allow every L2 to build a rich ecosystem around their product, especially impactful for onboarding/offboarding, imagine onboarding to any CB product via BASE.
Don't think people appreciate what is going on under the hood here...
2024 is really a new year for infra. Hyped.
— Georgios Konstantopoulos (@gakonst)
5:42 PM • Feb 21, 2024
Let us know how we did 👇Provide your feedback on today's issue of the Exponential Edge newsletter. (1 ⭐️ - not useful at all, 5 ⭐️ - extremely useful) |